Posts Tagged ‘National Broadband Plan’

Poll: How do you socialize with Erie media?

We haven’t asked your opinion in a while, but when we did ask about how you came down on the looming spectrum war between over-the-air broadcasters and the wireless community, an overwhelming majority sided with the TV stations to keep as much spectrum as needed to maintain free service.

The education reporter at the Erie Times-News, Sean McCracken told us this morning how the newspaper is deepening their commitment to social media, with nearly every reporter on staff now on Twitter. Of course, the paper itself, along with the TV newsrooms and early-adopter reporters have been tweeting for a while now (we’ve been tweeting since April 2009), and most have accompanying Facebook pages that roll stories and ask for input from readers and viewers (and some listeners of radio stations).

The question today is, how are you interacting with old-school media’s leveraging of social media? You can choose as many answers as you like, and weigh in on the comments.

How have you used Erie media's social media tools in the past year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Poll: where do you fall in the spectrum war?

When we last polled our P&T readers, we asked about your online video usage. A plurality said that they never watch local news video online, while over a third would occasionally do so. Just under a third would watch full newscasts or live video streams if offered.

There is much talk in the trade press about the looming spectrum crisis, with wireless broadband operators such as AT&T and Verizon screaming for more bandwidth, especially in the UHF “beachfront property” bands where signals can penetrate buildings better and have less dropout. That just happens to be where for the past 60 years your local television stations operate, and they are not giving up their “seed corn” without a fight.

The National Broadband Plan has called for an additional 500 MHz to be allocated to the wireless operators, a big chunk of which would come out of broadcasters’ spectrum “behind.” This proposal is coming after the spectrum that TV stations abandoned with the digital TV conversion.

So which side are you on; does the need for spectrum to operate smartphones and tablets and whatever next-generation technology is out there trump the outdated free TV model? Or is the highly-efficient, locally-responsive, and free one-to-many model of TV stations an inherent right of citizens in a representative democracy?

Where do you fall in the spectrum war?

  • With the TV stations: keep free TV available in all markets (72%, 21 Votes)
  • With the wireless operators: we need more spectrum to keep up with consumer demand (14%, 4 Votes)
  • I don't have a horse in this race (14%, 4 Votes)

Total Voters: 29

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Poll: which Flagship City logo do you prefer?

In our long running poll about whether television stations should give up wireless spectrum as part of the National Broadband Plan, our P&T readers were split: one-third said yes we need that bandwidth, a third said no, and almost a third said that they were ambivalent.

There is about a week left on the voting for a new Erie logo brand as The Flagship City. You can vote right now on the city’s website: www.erie.pa.us.

A: B:C: D:

I thought it would be fun to see which logo the media producers and consumers, the experts at how things should look and sound, selected as best.

Which Flagship City logo do Erie's media experts prefer (does not count toward the official vote on www.erie.pa.us)?

  • D: white Niagara on blue oval (36%, 16 Votes)
  • C: Niagara with multicolored sails (29%, 13 Votes)
  • A: white Niagara on multicolored squares (20%, 9 Votes)
  • B: light blue Niagara with red banner (15%, 7 Votes)

Total Voters: 45

Loading ... Loading ...

Poll: more TV spectrum for wireless broadband?

A couple weeks ago the Erie Times-News and P&T’s comments pages were flooded with angry readers responding to sports writer John Dudley’s column taking to task Indianapolis Colts star and Erie native Bob Sanders over his lack of “media savvy.” When we asked if you agreed or not with Dudley in a Press and Tower poll, just over half said “No.” However, a strong minority noted that Dudley at least made some good points in his calling out of Sanders.

Last week a huge announcement out of Washington: the Federal Communications Commission rolled out their National Broadband Plan. You might remember that Chairman Julius Genachowski was in Wattsburg along with Vice President Biden back in July touting the efforts to reach out to rural and poor areas of the country to bring broadband Internet to every home. One of the goals embedded in the plan is  100 mbps download speed and 50 mbps of upload speed for 100 million households by 2020.

The FCC says to make that happen they will need much more wireless spectrum. They have unabashedly targeted broadcast television for 120 MHz of that spectrum. You might recall that the TV industry gave up channels 52+ when the industry converted from analog to digital. Now the FCC is asking for at least channels 46-51, and may require stations to begin sharing 6 Mhz channels. I’m working on a story regarding any local impact.

On the other side, the proliferation of smartphones means that a spectrum crisis is looming unless something is done. What do you think?

Should broadcasters be required to give up television spectrum for the National Broadband Plan?

  • Yes: the future of wireless connectivity depends on it (35%, 12 Votes)
  • No: broadcasters have suffered enough with the DTV conversion and the economy (35%, 12 Votes)
  • I don't know/I don't care (30%, 10 Votes)

Total Voters: 34

Loading ... Loading ...