Posts Tagged ‘NAB’

What does the National Emergency Alert test mean to me?

Perhaps you’ve been seeing and hearing announcements about an upcoming nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System on your local TV, radio and cable stations and networks.  Well, conspiracy theories about black helicopters and those colored detour signs on the interstates aside, we have all the facts about the test and there’s nothing to worry about.

First, when is it?
The first nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) will take place on November 9, 2011 at 2 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time).

What’s it for?

From the FCC:

The purpose of the test is to assess the reliability and effectiveness of the EAS as a public alert mechanism. EAS Participants currently participate in state-level monthly tests and local-level weekly tests, but no top-down review of the entire system has ever been undertaken. The Commission, along with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, will use the results of this nationwide test to assess the reliability and effectiveness of the EAS as a public alert mechanism, and will work together with EAS stakeholders to make improvements to the system as appropriate.

According to the NAB, the EAS system has never been tested on a national scale before, and officials want to make a go of it, see what works, what doesn’t, and create a baseline from where they can make improvements.

What else can you tell me?

The test will be conducted by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The test will start at approximately 2 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) and will last approximately 60 seconds.

Then it’s back to Dr. Oz, the soaps, your Law and Order reruns, or your favorite 200 song playlist station.

Links:

Poll: where do you fall in the spectrum war?

When we last polled our P&T readers, we asked about your online video usage. A plurality said that they never watch local news video online, while over a third would occasionally do so. Just under a third would watch full newscasts or live video streams if offered.

There is much talk in the trade press about the looming spectrum crisis, with wireless broadband operators such as AT&T and Verizon screaming for more bandwidth, especially in the UHF “beachfront property” bands where signals can penetrate buildings better and have less dropout. That just happens to be where for the past 60 years your local television stations operate, and they are not giving up their “seed corn” without a fight.

The National Broadband Plan has called for an additional 500 MHz to be allocated to the wireless operators, a big chunk of which would come out of broadcasters’ spectrum “behind.” This proposal is coming after the spectrum that TV stations abandoned with the digital TV conversion.

So which side are you on; does the need for spectrum to operate smartphones and tablets and whatever next-generation technology is out there trump the outdated free TV model? Or is the highly-efficient, locally-responsive, and free one-to-many model of TV stations an inherent right of citizens in a representative democracy?

Where do you fall in the spectrum war?

  • With the TV stations: keep free TV available in all markets (72%, 21 Votes)
  • With the wireless operators: we need more spectrum to keep up with consumer demand (14%, 4 Votes)
  • I don't have a horse in this race (14%, 4 Votes)

Total Voters: 29

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Senate committee joins House in performance fees law

From All Access (registration required):

Multiple media sources are reporting that The SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE has approved its own version of a performance royalty bill for terrestrial radio. Like the previously approved HOUSE bill H.R. 848, The Performance Rights Act (S. 379) will force music radio stations to pay a performance fee to artists, musicians and rights holders for airplay.

Predictably, the MUSICFIRST COALITION was elated with the outcome. “Today we are one step closer to righting a wrong that has existed since the early days of radio; one step closer to winning the fight for fundamental justice that has been waged by countless artists and musicians over the last 80 years,” Exec. Dir. JENNIFER BENDALL stated. “We are grateful for the leadership of Chairman LEAHY, Sens. FEINSTEIN and HATCH and other members of the committee. We look forward to working with them and Chairman CONYERS, Reps. ISSA and BERMAN and other members who understand the importance of creating a fair performance right on radio for America’s artists and musicians.

As a (former) radio guy, it’s easy for me to side with the view that record companies wouldn’t sell nearly as much product without the free promotion that radio give them, so in return we should not have to pay a fee for airplay. Where that thinking breaks down is in the realm of oldies stations, 80′s, Classic Rock and the like, where the artist is no longer making new records, and doesn’t get anything for supplying programming for the stations that generate millions in revenue.

You would think that they could figure out a way to have a reasonable performance fee for product over five or ten years old, and a moratorium of fees on new product, when radio is more necessary to generate mechanical sales.

However, given the state of radio today, you could argue that you can’t get blood out of a rock! What say you?

The Feed for Friday, September 19th

Editor’s note: Sound off, give a shout out on “Deep Background,” our totally-random open discussion of all things Erie media.

  • Kanzius telethon update: The unprecedented multiple channel live broadcast generated a nearly unprecedented generous response. According to WSEE’s Scott Bremner, the Lilly Broadcasting stations WICU, WSEE and the CW raised well over $100,000 Tuesday evening during their Community for Kanzius event. Realizing the critical timing and extreme need for research funds, The Press and Tower has put a permanent link to the John Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation where you can make a donation at any time. (more…)